Planning Blunder #7: Redevelopment of Lake and Nicollet

Submitted for your approval: #7 in the official list of the Twin Cities’ Top Ten Planning Blunders.  Check out numbers 8, 9 and 10, and stay tuned here and at twin city sidewalks for the rest (although at the rate we’re putting them out, there will be more contenders by the time we’re done).

Target Field opened last year to wide acclaim; finally baseball fans had a facility that was connected to the city around it, most obviously due to the cluster of skyscrapers rising like an Emerald City from just beyond the outfield wall.  But Target Field is not the first stadium in the Twin Cities to have a skyline view; until the 1950s fans at Nicollet Ballpark could look beyond the Millers to the town whose name barely fit on their jersey.

Oh say what can you see?

Ok, so the word skyline might be giving these buildings too much credit, but the brick boxes of the streetcar node at Lake & Nicollet connected the stadium to the city in a very immediate way.  Sometimes window-shatteringly immediate.

In 1955, the Millers moved to the suburbs and Nicollet Ballpark followed them into oblivion, replaced in small part by a bank and in large part by a parking lot.  The mold was set for the redevelopment of the rest of the Lake & Nicollet area.

Why it’s dumb

In August 1949 photographers Norton & Peel documented the four corners of the intersection,  and when contrasted with Google StreetView they provide a much better description of why it’s bad than I can type out.

Southwest corner

Not so bad...

Southeast corner

Getting worse...

Northeast corner

Good God! What happened here?

Northwest corner

They blew it up!

I should point out that many people consider the redevelopment of Lake & Nicollet a blunder for another reason.  The city, for example, has produced an avalanche of plans that touch on the intersection, and most of their recommendations focus on “re-opening” Nicollet.  Take the Midtown Minneapolis Land Use and Development Plan of 2005, which under the heading Automobile Transportation recommends “open[ing] the intersection at Nicollet Ave and Lake Street to reconnect the street grid.”  Or the Nicollet Avenue report of 2000, which is surprisingly non-specific about the intersection area despite emphasizing that “reopening Nicollet at Lake is the single most important element in revitalizing Nicollet Avenue.”

While most calls for “reopening” connect the idea with redevelopment and streetscape improvement, it is usually clear that the impetus is automotive convenience.  It takes an extra minute or two to drive through the area – unacceptable!  In addition, many believe that the reduced traffic on the remaining segments of Nicollet played a part in reducing economic activity, although left unexplained is why the more successful segment (Eat Street) is also the least connected.  The reopeners may soon get back the minute of their life lost to the redevelopment of Lake and Nicollet – keep reading for details.

What they were thinking

Far out man

It didn’t take long after the Northwestern Bank for the corner of Nicollet and Lake to descend into a hellish cauldron of billiards, book stores* and Scientology.  Our benevolent City Fathers knew something had to be done, and when the legislature in 1971 added tax increment financing to cities’ redevelopment crayon box, they jumped into action by directing planning staff to begin to study options for implementing a market potential study exploring the conceivability of utilizing development tools under the direction of a district plan.

The November 1972 Lake-Nicollet Development District Plan is probably the grooviest city document ever.  Being familiar with the area in its present state, I was expecting to open it up and see a drawing of a giant parking lot full of cars, with maybe a speculative sketch of a drug addict mugging a clown.  Instead the first page threw this foxy lady in my face:

While the acid-bedraggled hippie who supplied the illustrations for the plan did his or her best to spruce up the concept, their goal was pretty modest.  It was less about waving their TIF wand to transform a toad-like streetcar node into a beautiful shopping mall princess, and more about an episode of the hit show Extreme Makeover: Node Edition on the TIF network.  You can see the schemes here and here and here.

Many of the existing buildings would remain, although curiously the signature corner buildings would have to go.  A glass roof would cover the spaces between buildings, rendering them nearly as pleasantly sterile as suburban shopping malls.  And a new bowling alley and theater would be a compelling substitute for the Dales, when implemented with at least two parking structures.  Here is another scribbly rendering of the 70s bliss-scape:

That 70s mall

Somehow the utopian dream did not come true.  By 1978 nothing had been re-done at Lake & Nicollet, and City Fathers were getting angry.  Enter Kmart, all mustache and lecherous sneer, and… fade to black.

My Take

The number of retail businesses in the Lake & Nicollet area continues to shrivel, from 54 in 1964 to 41 in 1972 to 21 today (the historic figures are from the Development District Plan, today’s numbers are according to google, the cracks of which some businesses certainly slip through).  Considering most of them offered wares that can be found at Kmart, often for less money, it is possible the Kmart drove them right out of business.

With the possible exception of traffic calming on Eat Street, the only good thing about Lake & Nicollet today is that its asphalt-covered form will make it that much easier to re-redevelop.  Apparently it wasn’t easy enough in the first half of the 00s, though, when George Sherman proposed an ambitious project for the superblock north of Lake, including 400 housing units, retail along Lake and a “reopened” Nicollet, and “small merchant stalls built into the sides of a new Nicollet Avenue bridge over the greenway [that] would echo the Ponte Vecchio in Florence, Italy.”  (If you have a rendering of the proposal, I’d love to see it – long hours on google resulted in nothing.)  Death came swiftly, in 2003, when the city couldn’t find the money for it.

Change will likely be coming relatively soon, assuming the city’s plan for a streetcar line on Nicollet is realized.  The plan would “reopen” Nicollet, necessitating Kmart’s destruction, and presumably someone would give in to the temptation to redevelop presented by two empty blocks.  Kmart, which owns the lots, could go ahead and build another Kmart, but it seems more likely that the city would take the entire block(s) and sell only to those who will redevelop more densely.

Option A

“Reopening” Nicollet would most likely allow vehicular traffic on the new street to drive through to Whittier – the City is always looking for an opportunity to make driving even slightly easier.  That would be a mistake, and not just because it would lead to increased traffic on Eat Street.  The heavy traffic would also delay the streetcar, just as heavy traffic delays the 18 bus in this area today.  But maybe most importantly, allowing cars would destroy the potential for a truly pedestrian-friendly business district, existing local examples of which can be counted on one hand.

Option B

Another wild card in the area is the 35W Access Project, which in its latest iteration has the word “transit” thrown in the middle.  This project has the potential to alter the area streetscape drastically, considering that some tentacles of this cephalopodic project involve widening Lake St to 131 feet (it’s 80 feet wide today).  Personally, I’m fine with that, since most of the girth is in wider sidewalks and a planted median.  But if they’re serious, why not take the 50 feet of the Kmart block that lines Lake Street ASAP and build a transit station?  When the Lake St widening was proposed (in 2002), the opposition of neighbors (and the price tag of the entire Access Project) effectively killed it.  But who would be opposed if an unused strip of parking lot was transformed into a transit station?  Even if the cheapest of shelters were thrown up, it would at least consolidate a confusing and often frenzied transfer into an easy one, making things easier for the 2500 people who board at the intersection on an average weekday.

That’s the amazing thing about Lake & Nicollet – planners and corporations connived to kill the area, removing most of the buildings and leaving us the choice of an empty asphalt desert or a narrow strip of salt-choked sidewalks, but still we come to this corner, drawn by its centrality or maybe by the certainty that our fellow Minneapolitans will be here in all their diverse tongues, activities and garb.  Ok, and we’re drawn by the cheap pizza, too.  It makes me certain that despite the mangled state of Lake & Nicollet today, change will come and bring a better corner, hopefully retiring blunder #7 and making room on the list for another challenger.

*In a retail clustering unimaginable in the 21st century, there were four book stores in the Nicollet/Lake area in the summer of 72.  The L-N Development District Plan has a listing of every area business, and while it does not distinguish between porn and non-porn book stores, it’s safe to make assumptions about the inventory in the “Risque Book Store.”

17 comments on “Planning Blunder #7: Redevelopment of Lake and Nicollet

  1. […] of the fantastic “Planning Blunders” series, and this time the subject is the K-Mart road block at Lake and Nicollet. It’s only #7 on the list, but it’s had a big impact on traffic flow and is a frequent […]

  2. mulad says:

    I never thought about keeping that block of Nicollet closed to traffic–or at least to cars. I’d like to see buses go straight through, though. It looks like Nicollet sees about 11,400 cars per day both north and south of the site. The parallel one-way streets see a few thousand each, so I suppose Nicollet could easily hit 15,000 per day if the route opened up again. Hard to say.

    Of course, the site should get redeveloped whether or not the road gets rebuilt. That K-mart is now 32 or 33 years old, so the company has got to be thinking of doing a refresh on the site anyway. It’s rumored to be their most profitable store, or at least among the best performers, so it’s hard for them to want to fix something that ain’t broke. Still, a freshened store could probably do even better for them.

    People only need to look half a mile west to Lyn-Lake to see what can be done with more urban designs. Lake and Nicollet must have a huge potential, albeit dampened by the presence of I-35W just two blocks away. I personally begin to feel uncomfortable about noise levels within about 1/4 mile of a freeway, although lining the freeway corridor with mid-rise office buildings and making liberal use of trees could blot out much of the sound.

    Has zoning for the K-mart site been changed at all yet? Maybe the city should just re-zone for mixed use, allowing K-mart to build more stuff on their lot. Companies are motivated by profit, and if they can draw more rent from their property, I think they’d be willing to build some new stuff. The K-mart itself might have a longer life than we want, but if they could at least fill in the empty corners at that intersection, I’m sure a lot of people in town would be happier with the site.

    • All four blocks that touch on Lake & Nicollet are zoned C3S, which is the district that basically exists to allow stuff like the Quarry. I don’t remember why they stopped the Nicollet-Franklin Pedestrian Overlay District at the greenway – obviously they never did any small area planning here so they could just as easily have included it. The C3A district is better for encouraging urbanish development, so it seems like they should change the zoning ASAP (don’t know why they didn’t change it with the Midtown rezoning).

      I definitely think any streetcar line should run in a reconnected Nicollet ROW, but I think it is less important for the buses – especially because the turning movements allow a dual bay bus station, which makes for easy transferring. But I won’t agitate against buses running on a reopened Nicollet, like I will against cars running on it.

  3. I would like to see a connected Nicollet Avenue (albeit via pedestrian/transit mall and/or limited car access). The current state of the intersection is so abysmal that I’m tempted just to say any would be an improvement.

    I have a bad feeling that Lake & Nicollet will be developed in the same lazy fashion that the site near Target on Lake & Hiawatha was redeveloped – a mixed-use building in a parking lot (it’s a strip mall with apartments). It’s better – but isn’t a great place.

    Anyway – great series of posts. The blunders themselves are depressing, but I’m optimistic that MPLS has planners like yourself.

  4. […] Street [see link below]. A local blog even labeled the department store’s location “Planning Blunder #7” of the Twin […]

  5. Mary says:

    Interesting read. I lived in the building on the northeast corner (above the candy store) from 1955-57 – Mom had a two room flat on the third floor with a shared hallway and bathroom. I remember the National T store, the ballpark, Harvey’s cafe, and of course the candy store. Mom would take three buses to get to her job at the Vet’s hospital laundry – I’d ride with her down Lake street to 27th, walk a block to Holy Trinity Church which ran a daycare. Times sure do change – I left Minneapolis in 1970 – sad to see what the intersection looks like today.

    • Mary says:

      correction: northwest corner – does anyone know the name of that building?

      • Thanks for commenting Mary. I’m sure the name of the building is in the Lake and Nicollet Redevelopment Plan referenced in this post. It’s at the Minneapolis Central Library – I’ll try to look it up for you next time I’m there.

    • Steven Gray says:

      I remember that building well, although I must have come along a little after you. In the early-to-mid 1960s the candy store had become a television store called Sun Television (later called Color House), owned by a guy named Doug Beard. My father worked as a TV repairman for him, and as a young teenager I spent many hours there, both at the street level where the salesmen sold TVs and in the basement where my father fixed the sets. It was a multiverse of vacuum tubes and testing equipment. Across Nicolett on the northeast corner there was a record store where I bought 45s of Herman’s Hermits, Dave Clark Five, Dino, Desi & Billy, etc. Harvey’s was a pretty decent (and affordable) place to eat. Across Lake Street, down towards Stevens Ave. was what was probably the best used book store in Minneapolis-“Nicolas Books.” The back part of the store was given over to a gigantic volume of old National Geographic magazines-dating all the way back to the 19th century. I bought a first edition of Steinbeck’s “Sweet Thursday” there (with a dust jacket in perfect condition) for $3.50. Above the TV shop there was a fly-by-night door-to-door magazine selling operation-some pretty shady characters. A vanished world.

  6. I figured I wasn’t the only one to notice this. I thought they connected, being a new resident, like Lyndale and Lake. I walked down Nicollet to get to Lake and just saw the back of a long-ass building and then just walked back up to a coffee shop and lo and behold it’s a suburban K-Mart. How high were these planners to cut off these two dense corridors from one another? It just makes no sense whatsoever, even back then.

  7. Molly says:

    Interesting that you suggest a Nicollet-Lake that is open to transit and closed to autos. I completed my architectural thesis last spring and that is exactly what I proposed. I spent 8 months on this project, researching, developing a masterplan, and designing a new Nicollet-Lake centered around the recreation of place. My design presumes that there would eventually be 2 intersecting streetcar lines on the site, one along Nicollet and one on the Greenway. The design I proposed is a neighborhood hub of urban activity that is focused around giving this vital node back to the neighborhoods that it belongs, Whittier and Lyndale. I have a 315 page book of my research, conclusions, graphics, plans, renderings, etc. Not sure what to do with all of it, but if anyone is interested in seeing my design, let me know.

    • Alex says:

      Wow, that sounds really cool. I’d definitely be interested in seeing your design. I imagine others would too – would you be interested in a guest post? If so, let me know if it’s alright for me to email you directly.

  8. Iain St James says:

    There is a renewed interest with Kmart announcing the closing of 100 stores (4 in Minnesota). They will soon announce another 42. I do not think they entire chain will survive 2012 honestly, and neither do most economic forecasts. The plans for 35w interchange are still in flux and Lake Street i infrastructure repair was stopped between 4th and Portland . I would be so thrilled to see your work!

  9. […] McLaughlin called this a “Kmart moment” with some hyperbole; it’s not clear that the apartments and the rail facilities are […]

  10. Elizabeth Raymakers says:

    I’m working on a project for school regarding the impacts of the Kmart in this area, and I was wondering if the author had any suggestions for further research, or would be available for an interview.

  11. […] why this stretch of Nicollet is so great today, and they both have to do with the presence of the crappy Lake Street K-Mart store that rudely truncates the South end of the street. First, having the K-Mart forfitying 29th Street […]

  12. Natalia Mendez says:

    Hi there, do you have a link or access to the old 70s plans you pulled clippings from? I’d love to see it/use it for a project I’m working on!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s